Eskimo North


          [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

          Sparc 4/670MP > 384MB weirdness...


          • To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, outages-list@eskimo.com
          • Subject: Sparc 4/670MP > 384MB weirdness...
          • From: Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com>
          • Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 13:38:58 -0800 (PST)
          • Resent-Date: Mon, 1 Nov 1999 13:39:12 -0800
          • Resent-From: outages-list@eskimo.com
          • Resent-Message-ID: <"3keLI.0.7z._XW7u"@mx1>
          • Resent-Sender: outages-list-request@eskimo.com

          
               I know that the 4/670MP isn't officially supported by Redhat, so please
          don't take this as a personal attack, I just thought someone might like to
          know, or someone may already know a work-around/fix for this problem... 
          
               I recently took all of the hardware out of an SS-10, CPU's, disk
          controller, etc, and put it back in a 4/670MP that I had retired, and fired it
          up to play news server for a while.  It has run stable under 2.2.x.
          
               It had 384MB of RAM in it.  But I had other 4/670MP's around and I had
          this idea that I could take memory from them and put more in this machine
          allowing it to cache more and maybe speed up news processing.
          
               With 384MB the machine boots and runs Linux like a top.  I tried to
          increase this to 512MB but when I put the additional memory in the boot does
          not complete.  After doing the partition check, it prints something like:
          
          dma device 29 unknown
          dma device 29 unknown
          dma device 29 unknown
          dma device 29 unknown
          
               It prints that four times, then complains that it can't open the root
          partition and waits for L1-A.
          
               Take the last 128MB of memory back out and everything is OK again.  No
          changes to fstab or disk configuration or anything other than memory.  The
          memory test tested all 512MB without any problem and there wasn't any other
          indication of bad memory. 
          
               Is there something about the 4/670MP DMA hardware that restricts it to
          384MB?  I tried putting more memory in one of these running SunOS once and it
          didn't complain but didn't run stable. 
          
          
          

          • Prev by Date: Eskinews...
          • Next by Date: Re: Sparc 4/670MP > 384MB weirdness...
          • Prev by thread: Mail Upgrade(s)...
          • Next by thread: Re: Sparc 4/670MP > 384MB weirdness...
          • Index(es):
            • Date
            • Thread