- To: Adam Rheaume <linux@adam.acol.com>
- Subject: Re: Sparc 4/670MP > 384MB weirdness...
- From: Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 19:33:05 -0800 (PST)
- cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, outages-list@eskimo.com
- In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9911022228380.23971-100000@deathstar.acol.com>
- Resent-Date: Tue, 2 Nov 1999 19:33:28 -0800
- Resent-From: outages-list@eskimo.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"CsiXv1.0.bl.7qw7u"@mx1>
- Resent-Sender: outages-list-request@eskimo.com
- Prev by Date: Sparc 4/670MP > 384MB weirdness...
- Next by Date: Virtual Domains
- Prev by thread: Sparc 4/670MP > 384MB weirdness...
- Next by thread: Eskinews...
- Index(es):
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sparc 4/670MP > 384MB weirdness...
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, Adam Rheaume wrote:
>
> That leads me to beleive that, that 128mb sim may be bad. Do you have any
> other chips you can test your theory with to make sure it isnt a bad chip?
>
> -=>Adam<=-
1) They were SIMMS from another 4/670MP that was functional before being
recently retired.
2) The memory diagnostics passed with no errors.