Eskimo North


          [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

          Mail...


          • To: outages-list@eskimo.com
          • Subject: Mail...
          • From: Robert Dinse <nanook@eskimo.com>
          • Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 19:01:38 -0800 (PST)
          • Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 19:01:42 -0800
          • Resent-From: outages-list@eskimo.com
          • Resent-Message-ID: <"7i--O2.0.sV2.LCuAu"@mx1>
          • Resent-Sender: outages-list-request@eskimo.com

          
               In the process of attempting to optimize disk I/O on mx1, now holding the
          mail spool; and crashing the machine in the process; I discovered a
          configuration error with mail. 
          
               The result of this error is that when you access your mail box via POP,
          the system was copying the mail spool from mx1 to mail back to mx1 via NFS, and
          then reading from mx1 to mail via NFS again to download to your machine.  In
          short, the file was being copied three times across the network instead of once
          because of an error in the order that file systems were mounted. 
          
               This has been corrected; I've also optimized some of the I/O parameters
          on mx1 and file system settings.
          
               Hopefully mail will go acceptably fast now, but if it doesn't I will
          replace the LX that is presently serving as the POP server with a faster
          machine. 
          
               I would be interested in feedback from people with respect to POP mail
          response; is it better?  Does it still suck?
          
          
          
          

          • Prev by Date: Tacoma 56k intermittent busies 11/10
          • Next by Date: sl-gw9-sea (fwd)
          • Prev by thread: sl-gw9-sea (fwd)
          • Next by thread: Tacoma 56k intermittent busies 11/10
          • Index(es):
            • Date
            • Thread