Dapper '1' and Dreadful '0'
for 10-track autopiano
[1:22]

Dapper '1'
Tinkering one day with the Fibonacci series, I wondered what might happen if, rather than summing at each step only the most recent pair, I were to sum internally all pairs thus-far generated, placing each sum between (not after) its pair elements:

      starting with               1 2
      one iteration giving    1 3 2
      the next                     1 4 3 5 2
      and so on.
By its 9th iteration my impromptu generating script output all integers between 1 and 88 (the piano range) at least once and up to 10 times. With this data reserved as pitch source, I shaped a progression of equal durations, as follows:
at each instance, a term (MIDI key number) within range is allocated to one of 10 unique-volumed tracks, according to the term's occurrence tally at that instance;

for each term so assigned, a rest is correspondingly positioned on all other tracks (i.e., its time component is preserved);

an additional track, a copy of #1 but with the rest slots filled in by extension of their just-previous notes, integrates and highlights the pattern of first occurrences.

The movement is written in full score, as it has few enough tracks to fit a 11x17" page.

Dreadful '0'
Then, a comeuppance. Browsing at the "On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences" (OEIS), I encountered for the first time Stern's Biatomic array.  Run for two iterations beyond the series I had improvised, this one clearly subsumed that former's output!

The difference, Stern's seeds "0 1" replacing my hazarded "1 2", exposes something extraordinary at work: with this "0 1" start, every generator iteration first replicates the just-previous one before appending then a continuation of its own.  My reseeded script generated the sequence as follows:

      starting with                0 1
      one iteration giving     0 1 1
      the next                      0 1 1 2 1
      and so on.
Running this way well into its 11th iteration, the procedure now filled the 88-slot range only after 1276 terms, accumulating an occurrence-frequency maximum of 42.  Musical realization here, to be conceptually akin to movement 1, called for selective re-specifying, as follows:
there are now 42 unique-volume-specific tracks, necessarily at much narrower volume differences;

tempo is now 4-fold, to put so many more events into a time span compatible with Dapper '1';

a 3-second coda cascades the first occurrences.
This movement, with too many tracks to fit the page, is written as separate parts.

Neither score is intended to facilitate human performance. The music is for auto-sequencer, with scoring intended simply as a reasonably patterned read-along image. It uses alto clef exclusively, sparing the eye an incessant disruption of clef changes.

The movements are named for what strikes me as their "character" -- ultimately their comfy-vs-jagged patterns of volume distribution.


Access: scores ( D1+ D0); audio, video.