Subject: Congratulations! You can get a $100 Dollar General gift card!

From: "Dollar General Opinion Requested" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 06:00:33 -0700 (PDT)

Spam detection software, running on the system "mx1.eskimo.com",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
[email-masked] for details.

Content preview:  Congratulations! You can get a $100 Dollar General gift card!
   http://detoxfootpatch.za.com/WPIa4nXciItbXpFdo8yMFOyGuHCDjm3g0Oy7VfSLXtP-TZM6Mw
   http://detoxfootpatch.za.com/hEQVaR9wtJGeUIJPsqunzgDzHKb0SmqUPZTuHlylVWbX5Ja4Ww

Content analysis details:   (109.6 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.9 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL      Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL
                            blocklist
                            [URIs: detoxfootpatch.za.com]
 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
                            blocked.  See
                            http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                             for more information.
                            [URIs: detoxfootpatch.za.com]
 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL           RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
                            [107.179.100.163 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
 100 SHORTCIRCUIT           Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited
                            rule
 5.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_LASTEXTERNAL The last untrusted relay is listed in
                            Spamhaus ZEN

The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam.  If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

Subject: Congratulations! You can get a $100 Dollar General gift card!
From: "Dollar General Opinion Requested" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 06:00:33 -0700 (PDT)

Congratulations! You can get a $100 Dollar General gift card!

http://detoxfootpatch.za.com/WPIa4nXciItbXpFdo8yMFOyGuHCDjm3g0Oy7VfSLXtP-TZM6Mw

http://detoxfootpatch.za.com/hEQVaR9wtJGeUIJPsqunzgDzHKb0SmqUPZTuHlylVWbX5Ja4Ww

oschen chose to proceed by appointing an advisory commission, the Committee on the Design of Coins, in February 1891, with a brief "to examine the designs on the various coins put into circulation in the year 1887, and the improvements in those designs since suggested, and to make such recommendations on the subject as might seem desirable, and to report what coins, if any, should have values expressed on them in words and figures". The committee was chaired by the Liberal MP, Sir John Lubbock, and the other members were David Powell, Deputy Governor of the Bank of England; Richard Blaney Wade, Chairman of the National Provincial Bank; Sir Frederic Leighton, President of the Royal Academy; Sir John Evans, President of the British Numismatic Society; and Sir Charles Fremantle, Deputy Master of the Royal Mint.

At its first meeting, on 12 February 1891, the committee recommended that the double florin not be further struck. They felt that as the five-shilling piece would continue to be coined, two large silver pieces were unnecessary. The government agreed with the recommendation—minting of the double florin had been suspended in August 1890. At its second, on 27 February, the committee considered an open competition for new coinage designs, but instead decided to invite several artists (all Royal Academicians or associate members of the academy) to submit proposals. The invited artists were asked to submit two portraits of Victoria, both left-facing, since the Royal Mint was contemplating not using the same portrait on the florin and half crown to avoid confusion between the denominations, which were close in size and value. Entrants were offered £150 for their labours, an amount the Illustrated London News considered inadequate, and two artists declined the invitation.

The competition had a de