Subject: Back to the land people

From: "Transform" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 04:00:38 -0800 (PST)

Spam detection software, running on the system "mx2.eskimo.com",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
[email-masked] for details.

Content preview:  Back to the land people http://extrasurvey.shop/LbPTb8axOXyOmBOXkBEItMv8WcxWshs55t4D0d7DbNfI6CH7mg
   http://extrasurvey.shop/zGzbxKVHLxJhqP4o__G2LcAe9DosvQjaSbAJBRQPo_3-QzS8Aw

Content analysis details:   (59.2 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.9 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL      Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL
                            blocklist
                            [URIs: extrasurvey.shop]
 1.7 URIBL_BLACK            Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
                            [URIs: extrasurvey.shop]
 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL           RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
                            [23.247.83.166 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
  50 DMARC_FAIL             DMARC check failed
 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR        SPF: test of record failed (permerror)
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
                            mail domains are different
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 0.0 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII
                             but isn't
 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or
                            identical to background
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                            valid
 1.1 DCC_CHECK              Detected as bulk mail by DCC (dcc-servers.net)
 0.0 FSL_BULK_SIG           Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe
 0.1 DKIM_INVALID           DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid
 1.3 LONGLN_LOW_CONTRAST    Excessively long line + hidden text
 0.0 KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS       Relay HELO differs from its IP's reverse DNS

The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam.  If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

Subject: Back to the land people
From: "Transform" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 04:00:38 -0800 (PST)

Back to the land people

http://extrasurvey.shop/LbPTb8axOXyOmBOXkBEItMv8WcxWshs55t4D0d7DbNfI6CH7mg

http://extrasurvey.shop/zGzbxKVHLxJhqP4o__G2LcAe9DosvQjaSbAJBRQPo_3-QzS8Aw

he Réunion swamphen was described as having entirely blue plumage with a red beak and legs, and is generally agreed to have been a large, terrestrial swamphen, with features indicative of reduced flight capability, such as larger size and more robust legs. There has been disagreement over the size of the bird, as Dubois' account compared its size with that of a Réunion ibis while that of the French engineer Jean Feuilley from 1704 compared it to a domestic chicken. Cheke stated in 1987 that Feuilley's account would indicate the bird was not unusually large, perhaps the size of a swamphen. Hume pointed out in 2019 that the Réunion ibis would have been 65–68 cm (26–27 in) at most, similar to the extant African sacred ibis (including the tail), while chickens could be 65–70 cm (26–28 in) in length (the size of their ancestor, the wild red junglefowl), and there was therefore no contradiction. The Réunion swamphen would thereby have been about t