Subject: Leave your feedback and you could WIN!

From: "Nike Shopper Feedback" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 01:58:25 -0800 (PST)

Spam detection software, running on the system "mx2.eskimo.com",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
[email-masked] for details.

Content preview:  Leave your feedback and you could WIN! http://solarfoodslight.best/CQUjuB76Zr1hDlWhbpgipi3wpqkJ_ZPLazc5-U2okiLyzv37ww
   http://solarfoodslight.best/YwxdqT994KJVn57f01-qOgdfW1JVYS6_WXi4l4J9ZECgLXiQSg

Content analysis details:   (60.0 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL           RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
                            [23.247.83.165 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
 1.7 URIBL_BLACK            Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
                            [URIs: solarfoodslight.best]
 1.9 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL      Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL
                            blocklist
                            [URIs: solarfoodslight.best]
  50 DMARC_FAIL             DMARC check failed
 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR        SPF: test of record failed (permerror)
 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level
                            mail domains are different
 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record
 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or
                            identical to background
 0.0 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII
                             but isn't
 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                            valid
 1.1 DCC_CHECK              Detected as bulk mail by DCC (dcc-servers.net)
 0.1 DKIM_INVALID           DKIM or DK signature exists, but is not valid
 0.0 FSL_BULK_SIG           Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe
 0.8 FROM_FMBLA_NEWDOM28    From domain was registered in last 14-28
                            days
 1.3 LONGLN_LOW_CONTRAST    Excessively long line + hidden text
 0.0 KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS       Relay HELO differs from its IP's reverse DNS

The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam.  If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

Subject: Leave your feedback and you could WIN!
From: "Nike Shopper Feedback" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 01:58:25 -0800 (PST)

Leave your feedback and you could WIN!

http://solarfoodslight.best/CQUjuB76Zr1hDlWhbpgipi3wpqkJ_ZPLazc5-U2okiLyzv37ww

http://solarfoodslight.best/YwxdqT994KJVn57f01-qOgdfW1JVYS6_WXi4l4J9ZECgLXiQSg

n 1974, an attempt was made to find fossil localities on the Plaine des Cafres plateau, where the bird was said to have lived, but no caves (which might contain kitchen middens where early settlers discarded bones of local birds) were found, and it was determined that a more careful study of the area was needed before excavations could be made. In 1977, the American ornithologist Storrs L. Olson found the old accounts consistent with an endemic derivative of Porphyrio, and considered it a probable species whose remains might one day be discovered. The British ecologist Anthony S. Cheke considered previous arguments about the bird's affinities in 1987, and supported it being a Porphyrio relative, while noting that there were two further contemporary accounts. The same year, the British writer Errol Fuller listed the bird as a hypothetical species, and expressed puzzlement as to how a considerable literature had been derived from such "flimsy material".

The French palaeontologist Cécile Mourer-Chauviré and colleagues listed the bird as Cyanornis (?=Porphyrio) caerulescens in 2006, indicating the uncertainty of its classification. They stated the reason no fossils of it had been found was probably because it did not live in the parts of Réunion where fossils might have been preserved. Cheke and the British palaeontologist Julian P. Hume stated in 2008 that since the mystery of the "Réunion solitaire" had been solved after it was identified with ibis remains, the Réunion swamphen remains the