Subject: Can Your Bug Spray Do This?

From: "Bug Buffet" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 03:22:30 -0700 (PDT)

Spam detection software, running on the system "mx1.eskimo.com",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
[email-masked] for details.

Content preview:  Can Your Bug Spray Do This? http://flexdental.rest/VlR0ggIdSh3nRatQun9esYx5jjvckPKscC52zC_DTcHCn48wgw
   http://flexdental.rest/IazsyXlSBtOlZfcTs9wttnaG_3ef5oeKBfz_qR4McHsSMYho6A

Content analysis details:   (112.6 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.9 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL      Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL
                            blocklist
                            [URIs: flexdental.rest]
 1.7 URIBL_BLACK            Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
                            [URIs: flexdental.rest]
 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in
                            bl.spamcop.net
             [Blocked - see <https://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?192.200.220.13>]
 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL           RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
                            [192.200.220.13 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
 100 SHORTCIRCUIT           Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited
                            rule
 5.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_LASTEXTERNAL The last untrusted relay is listed in
                            Spamhaus ZEN

The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam.  If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

Subject: Can Your Bug Spray Do This?
From: "Bug Buffet" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2022 03:22:30 -0700 (PDT)

Can Your Bug Spray Do This?

http://flexdental.rest/VlR0ggIdSh3nRatQun9esYx5jjvckPKscC52zC_DTcHCn48wgw

http://flexdental.rest/IazsyXlSBtOlZfcTs9wttnaG_3ef5oeKBfz_qR4McHsSMYho6A

y 1961, although it was yet to launch a person into space, the STG was confident that Project Mercury had overcome its initial setbacks, and that the United States had overtaken the Soviet Union as the most advanced nation in space technology. The STG began considering Mercury Mark II, a two-person successor to the Mercury spacecraft. This confidence was shattered on April 12, 1961, when the Soviet Union launched Vostok 1, and cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin became the first person to orbit the Earth. In response, President John F. Kennedy announced a far more ambitious goal on May 25, 1961: to put a man on the Moon by the end of the decade. The effort to land a man on the Moon already had a name: Project Apollo. The two-person Mercury II spacecraft concept was formally announced by the STG head, Robert R. Gilruth, on December 7, 1961, and on January 3, 1962, it was officially named Project Gemini.

On April 18, 1962, NASA formally announced that it was accepting applications for a new group of astronauts who would assist the Mercury astronauts with Project Mercury, and join them in flying Project Gemini missions. It was anticipated that they might go on to command Project Apollo missions. Unlike the selection process for the Mercury Seven, which was carried out in secret, this selection was widely advertised; public announcements and the minimum standards were communicated to aircraft companies, government agencies and the Societ