Subject: Common food linked to dementia

From: "Dementia Warning" <Dementia [email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 06:34:47 -0800 (PST)

Spam detection software, running on the system "mx1.eskimo.com",
has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
[email-masked] for details.

Content preview:  Common food linked to dementia http://backcorrecters.co.uk/GxF5X1kqocmAqjO1CaZzNe7NBFkZRZ1tZch29TJwWzvkuc_S5w
   http://backcorrecters.co.uk/aLOQxsvuuzUC5Q57yuvjKn3z2TNb1jT2uf-j-5u-c3tGbGC5fA

Content analysis details:   (107.7 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
                            blocked.  See
                            http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                             for more information.
                            [URIs: backcorrecters.co.uk]
 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL           RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
                            [23.95.184.208 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
-0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2      RBL: Average reputation (+2)
                            [23.95.184.208 listed in wl.mailspike.net]
 100 SHORTCIRCUIT           Not all rules were run, due to a shortcircuited
                            rule
 5.0 RCVD_IN_ZEN_LASTEXTERNAL The last untrusted relay is listed in
                            Spamhaus ZEN

The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to
open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus,
or confirm that your address can receive spam.  If you wish to view
it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor.

Subject: Common food linked to dementia
From: "Dementia Warning" <Dementia [email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 06:34:47 -0800 (PST)

Common food linked to dementia

http://backcorrecters.co.uk/GxF5X1kqocmAqjO1CaZzNe7NBFkZRZ1tZch29TJwWzvkuc_S5w

http://backcorrecters.co.uk/aLOQxsvuuzUC5Q57yuvjKn3z2TNb1jT2uf-j-5u-c3tGbGC5fA

At first, the smaller warships faction prevailed. After Law no. 1452 was passed on 30 December 1905, which authorized £4,214,550 for new warship construction (£1,685,820 in 1906), three small battleships, three armored cruisers, six destroyers, twelve torpedo boats, three submarines, a collier, and a training ship were ordered. Though the Brazilian government later eliminated the armored cruisers for monetary reasons, the Minister of the Navy, Admiral Júlio César de Noronha, signed a contract with Armstrong Whitworth for the planned battleships on 23 July 1906. The acquisition was supported by the incoming Brazilian president Afonso Pena, who told the National Congress of Brazil in November 1906 that the ships were necessary to replace the antiquated vessels composing the current navy and a battleship which had unexpectedly blown up earlier that year.

Even though the orders went to a British company, the British ambassador to Brazil was opposed to the planned naval expansion due to its large cost and negative impact on relations between Brazil and Argentina. He saw it as "an embodiment of national vanity, combined with personal motives of a pecuniary character." The US ambassador to Brazil also spoke out against the purchase and warned his Department of State of the regional destabilization that could occur if the situation devolved into