Joe Newman's machine
The Hubbard transformer
Searl's "Levity discs"
Floyd Sweet's VTA
Pavlita's radionic devices
Biefeld-Brown effect devices
Shoulders' EV technology
Hodowonak's gravity detector
The Kromrey Converter:
These devices can exhibit interesting operation, but a much more
sophisticated timing system is needed than is described in the published
materials on these devices. The batteries take quite a pounding though,
and fail quickly. Care needs to be taked as there is a huge amount of
hydrogen produced. Gell cells do not survive long in this application.
Kromrey Converters will run self powered for far longer than can be easily
explained, but it's quite difficult to rule out shock excitation of the
battery electrolyte. The quick depletion of the battery might support this
hypothisis. Due to the high frequancy components accross the battery while
in operation, measurments are difficult, and the power factor is unsteady,
making it quite hard to analize the exact performance of the system.
Over unity operation may be present, but is hard to prove. Special cells
add cost faster than they add useable life to the system. No gain there so
In any case, the Kromrey converter does not produce "free energy", as the
cost of batteries is quite high, and you must begin with a charged battery
to start the device initialy. The environmental impact of battery
manufacture and disposal appear to rule this design out from any large
I lost interest in tis design some years ago due to these factors, and due
to the fact that operating a Kromrey converter apparently produces an
imballance in the virtual particle flux near the device, as it is
electrically unballanced operation. This might easilt be addressed, but
the battery issues are more complex.
Interesting, but a dead end in my opinion.
The Brandt-Tesla switch:
The Brandt-Tesla switch suffers the same problems, it does not produce
"free energy", but it does produce cheap energy. In a electrostatically
ballenced configurration (4 cell, as opposed to the simpler two unequal
cell configuration) it does appear to go over unity for short times, but
again, the cells take a pounding and quickly fail. Shock excitation of the
electrolyte is difficult to disprove, so sadly this device, and any device
dependant on rechargable batteries would appear to be a dead end.
Again, a much more sophisticated timing devices is needed, each battery
should be monitored by a microcontroller that controlls adaptive timing for
the switches. The batteries will soon reach unequal electrical conditions.
Shutting down and physically moving the cells around, like rotating tires,
helps to a degree, but not enough. Teh high frequancy components accross
the batteries make data collection difficult for the microcontroller, and
extensive filtering is needed. This filtering effects teh microcontrollers
response time to the state of the batteries, and lowers the useful life of
the cells as the charging cycle cannot be as accurately controlled.
The important lesson from this device is that in the ballanced
configuration, the virtual particle imballence is greatly reduced or
absent. This imballance can be detected by a high grade electrometer
inside a Faraday cage, or by a Gradiometer.
N machines have not proven over unity operation. The Sunburst device
appeared to go over unity, but once power factors and careful measurments
were taken into account, over unity operation was not proven. There may be
unknown factors in it's operation though, but still not proven to be over
There is a varient of the N machine that does not produce power, but MAY
have an apparent loss of weight while in operation. This variation closes
the path of magnetic flux through the disk, but not radialy. Equal but
opposite currents are induced in a pattern around the disk.
My personal experience with N machines is largely limited to this varient.
This device may have nore to do with Searl's device than the N machines, or
fall somewhere in between.
Over all, N machines appear to still have unresolved issues in their
operation, and may well hold some promise. Some work done on N machine
varients in India reported over unity operation some time ago, but little
further has been published on these so caled "Space Power
Generators". I give these an "undecided" rating.
The Grey motor:
While I have no experience with this device, Grey's motor has apparently
been shown not to be over unity recently. I think the papers on this can
be found in the INE proceedings. Anyone have these referances?
This page is on the Eskimo North service, in Seattle, WA. Try the
Main Eskimo home page.
Mail me at: email@example.com
If you are using Lynx, type "c" to send me a comment. firstname.lastname@example.org.